<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 868 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99180</link>
    <description>An appellate order that addresses only the department&#039;s case and omits consideration of the assessee&#039;s submissions is not a proper reasoned decision. Where material contentions are ignored and the order does not show application of mind, it cannot be sustained. The appropriate course is to set aside such an order and remand the matter for a fresh speaking order after hearing both sides. The impugned appellate order was therefore set aside and the dispute was sent back for fresh adjudication on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:53:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 868 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99180</link>
      <description>An appellate order that addresses only the department&#039;s case and omits consideration of the assessee&#039;s submissions is not a proper reasoned decision. Where material contentions are ignored and the order does not show application of mind, it cannot be sustained. The appropriate course is to set aside such an order and remand the matter for a fresh speaking order after hearing both sides. The impugned appellate order was therefore set aside and the dispute was sent back for fresh adjudication on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>