Rectification is limited to apparent record errors; a wrong view in reasoning must be pursued in appeal, not rectification.

A rectification application cannot be used to correct an alleged wrong view taken in a final order where the impugned observations form part of the Tribunal's reasoning on the record. Only mistakes apparent from the record, such as clerical or obvious errors, can be rectified; a disputed conclusion must be challenged before the proper appellate forum. On that basis, the application was held not maintainable and was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether the alleged errors in the final order constituted mistakes apparent from the record warranting rectification.

Analysis: The impugned observations were held to be part of the Tribunal's reasoning on the basis of the material on record and not clerical or obvious mistakes. It was held that a wrong view, even if assumed, cannot be corrected through a rectification application, as such correction lies in an appropriate appellate forum and not by invoking the power of rectification.

Conclusion: The application for rectification was not maintainable and was rejected.

---