<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 409 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97215</link>
    <description>A rectification application cannot be used to correct an alleged wrong view taken in a final order where the impugned observations form part of the Tribunal&#039;s reasoning on the record. Only mistakes apparent from the record, such as clerical or obvious errors, can be rectified; a disputed conclusion must be challenged before the proper appellate forum. On that basis, the application was held not maintainable and was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:01:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 409 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97215</link>
      <description>A rectification application cannot be used to correct an alleged wrong view taken in a final order where the impugned observations form part of the Tribunal&#039;s reasoning on the record. Only mistakes apparent from the record, such as clerical or obvious errors, can be rectified; a disputed conclusion must be challenged before the proper appellate forum. On that basis, the application was held not maintainable and was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>