Statutory remedy for refund rejection must be pursued before seeking Tribunal intervention in a miscellaneous application.

Where a competent authority passes an appealable order rejecting a refund claim, the Tribunal will not bypass the statutory remedy and direct sanction of refund in a miscellaneous application. The applicant was required to challenge the rejection before the appropriate appellate authority rather than seek intervention from the Tribunal. The miscellaneous application was therefore held not maintainable, and no direction for refund sanction was granted.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal should direct sanction of refund on a miscellaneous application when the refund claim had already been rejected by the Assistant Commissioner.

Analysis: The refund claim was filed in consequence of the Tribunal's earlier order and was rejected by the Assistant Commissioner. The rejection order was itself appealable, so the applicant had to pursue the statutory remedy before the competent authority rather than seek a direction from the Tribunal in the miscellaneous application.

Conclusion: The Tribunal declined to interfere and held that the miscellaneous application was not maintainable for directing refund sanction.

Final Conclusion: The refund dispute was left to be pursued through the available appellate remedy, and no direction for sanction of refund was granted.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a competent authority passes an appealable order on a refund claim, the Tribunal will not bypass the statutory remedy and issue a direct sanction order in a miscellaneous application.

---