<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 442 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95628</link>
    <description>Where a competent authority passes an appealable order rejecting a refund claim, the Tribunal will not bypass the statutory remedy and direct sanction of refund in a miscellaneous application. The applicant was required to challenge the rejection before the appropriate appellate authority rather than seek intervention from the Tribunal. The miscellaneous application was therefore held not maintainable, and no direction for refund sanction was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:08:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 442 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95628</link>
      <description>Where a competent authority passes an appealable order rejecting a refund claim, the Tribunal will not bypass the statutory remedy and direct sanction of refund in a miscellaneous application. The applicant was required to challenge the rejection before the appropriate appellate authority rather than seek intervention from the Tribunal. The miscellaneous application was therefore held not maintainable, and no direction for refund sanction was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>