Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Section 95 of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 applied where the appeal had already been decided finally and only a rectification application remained pending.
Analysis: The entitlement to invoke the Scheme depended on the dispute still being subsisting in the manner contemplated by the provision. Where the appeal had already attained finality, the pendency of a separate rectification application did not revive the matter for the purposes of Section 95. On that basis, no illegality was found in the impugned order.
Conclusion: Section 95 of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 was held inapplicable to the petitioner.