https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94263 Section 95 of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 applied only where the dispute remained subsisting in the manner contemplated by the provision. If the appeal had already attained finality, the mere pendency of a separate rectification application did not revive the matter for Scheme purposes. On that basis, the provision was treated as inapplicable to the petitioner, and no illegality was found in the impugned order. en-us Fri, 24 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94263 Section 95 of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 applied only where the dispute remained subsisting in the manner contemplated by the provision. If the appeal had already attained finality, the mere pendency of a separate rectification application did not revive the matter for Scheme purposes. On that basis, the provision was treated as inapplicable to the petitioner, and no illegality was found in the impugned order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94263