Verification of appeal memorandum required; failure to cure the defect led to dismissal for procedural non-compliance.

An appeal memorandum that was not verified at the end, as required by the applicable rule, was treated as a material procedural lapse. The defect was not cured despite an earlier warning in the stay proceedings, and that failure was considered sufficient cause for dismissal. The appeal was therefore dismissed for non-compliance with Rule 11.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appeal was liable to be dismissed for non-compliance with the requirement governing verification in the appeal memorandum.

Analysis: The appeal memorandum was not verified at the end as required and the defect was treated as a material procedural lapse. The prior warning issued in the stay proceedings was also relied upon, and the absence of rectification was treated as sufficient cause for dismissal.

Conclusion: The appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with Rule 11.

---