Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a reference application should be allowed on the question whether HDPE bags or sacks were eligible inputs for Modvat credit during the period when they were specifically excluded under Rule 57A.
Analysis: The relevant period was after the exclusion clause had come into force, and the items in question were specifically excluded from the list of inputs eligible for Modvat credit. In these circumstances, the Tribunal found that a point of law arose out of the earlier final order and that the matter required reference to the High Court.
Conclusion: The reference application was allowed.
Final Conclusion: The Tribunal did not decide the Modvat-credit entitlement on merits, but concluded that the issue warranted reference because the disputed period fell within the exclusion regime.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the disputed goods are covered by a statutory exclusion applicable during the relevant period, a reference application on the resulting legal question is maintainable and may be allowed.