Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for dispensing with pre-deposit of duty and staying recovery pending appeal.
Analysis: The application for stay turned on the classification dispute relating to a belt conveyor system. On the material placed, including the customer order and drawings, the Tribunal found that the entire system minus the belt had been supplied by the appellant. In that prima facie view, the goods appeared to fall under the heading claimed by the appellant, and the appellant therefore established a sufficient case for interim relief.
Conclusion: The condition of pre-deposit was dispensed with and recovery of the duty demand was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.