<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 348 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91264</link>
    <description>A prima facie classification dispute over a belt conveyor system justified interim relief on stay, as the material showed that the appellant had supplied the system minus the belt. On that provisional view, the goods appeared to fall under the heading claimed by the appellant, so the Tribunal held that a sufficient case had been made out to dispense with pre-deposit of duty and to stay recovery of the demand pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 18:38:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 348 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91264</link>
      <description>A prima facie classification dispute over a belt conveyor system justified interim relief on stay, as the material showed that the appellant had supplied the system minus the belt. On that provisional view, the goods appeared to fall under the heading claimed by the appellant, so the Tribunal held that a sufficient case had been made out to dispense with pre-deposit of duty and to stay recovery of the demand pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>