Maintainability of reference under Central Excise law turns on whether the dispute is really about classification and cess rate.

The reference application was not maintainable under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 because the proposed question concerned the rate of cess on jute bags, which depended on their tariff classification as hessians or sacking, rather than an abstract question of law. As the dispute was directly tied to classification and duty rate, it fell outside the scope of a maintainable reference under that provision, and the application was dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Revenue's reference application was maintainable under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 where the underlying dispute concerned classification of jute bags and the rate of cess.

Analysis: The subject matter of the proposed reference was not an abstract question of law but the rate of cess payable on jute bags, which depended upon their classification as hessians/sacking or as distinct jute manufactures. Since the controversy went to the rate of duty and classification, the reference did not fall within the maintainable scope of Section 35G.

Conclusion: The reference application was not maintainable and was dismissed.

---