Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the adjudication order could confirm duty demand in excess of the amount and grounds proposed in the show-cause notice.
Analysis: The notice proposed duty demands on two stated grounds, but the impugned order confirmed a larger demand by travelling beyond the quantified proposals and by resting on grounds not specified in the notice. An adjudication which exceeds the scope of the notice and introduces new grounds without notice violates the principles of natural justice.
Conclusion: The order could not be sustained as it confirmed demand beyond the show-cause notice and was therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: An adjudicating authority cannot confirm a demand beyond the scope of the show-cause notice or on grounds not put to notice, as such action offends natural justice.