<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 188 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90887</link>
    <description>An adjudicating authority cannot confirm a duty demand beyond the scope of the show-cause notice or rely on grounds not specifically put to notice. Where the notice proposed duty on stated grounds, but the adjudication order enlarged the demand and proceeded on additional grounds, the order offended the principles of natural justice. The demand could not be sustained and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:56:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 188 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90887</link>
      <description>An adjudicating authority cannot confirm a duty demand beyond the scope of the show-cause notice or rely on grounds not specifically put to notice. Where the notice proposed duty on stated grounds, but the adjudication order enlarged the demand and proceeded on additional grounds, the order offended the principles of natural justice. The demand could not be sustained and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>