Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the classification dispute concerning rubberised cotton fabrics required reconsideration in view of the Tribunal's earlier remand in the respondents' own case, and whether the impugned order should be set aside and the matter remanded for redetermination.
Analysis: The goods arose as an intermediate product during manufacture of transmission rubber belting. The Tribunal noted that in the respondents' own earlier proceedings involving the same issue for an earlier period, the matter had already been remanded for fresh determination of classification under Heading 59.05 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, with reference to marketability, Chapter Note 3(a) to Chapter 59, and the relevant exemption notification. Since the present demand related to a later period but involved an identical issue, consistency required that the dispute be reconsidered in the same manner.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for reconsideration in accordance with the Tribunal's earlier directions.