<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 224 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89315</link>
    <description>Rubberised cotton fabrics used as an intermediate product in transmission rubber belting were required to be reconsidered for classification under Heading 59.05 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, with reference to marketability, Chapter Note 3(a) to Chapter 59, and the relevant exemption notification. Because the respondents&#039; own earlier case on the same classification issue for an earlier period had already been remanded for fresh determination, consistency required the later dispute to be examined in the same manner. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for redetermination in accordance with the earlier directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:16:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 224 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89315</link>
      <description>Rubberised cotton fabrics used as an intermediate product in transmission rubber belting were required to be reconsidered for classification under Heading 59.05 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, with reference to marketability, Chapter Note 3(a) to Chapter 59, and the relevant exemption notification. Because the respondents&#039; own earlier case on the same classification issue for an earlier period had already been remanded for fresh determination, consistency required the later dispute to be examined in the same manner. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for redetermination in accordance with the earlier directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>