Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the enhancement of assessable value of imported auto accessories could be sustained under the residual valuation rule on the basis of non-contemporaneous invoices from another country of origin.
Analysis: The invoices relied upon by the department were not contemporaneous with the import and were from Singapore suppliers, whereas the goods imported were of Taiwan origin. The quantities in most of the relied upon invoices were lower than the quantities imported, and there was no effective rebuttal of the appellant's contention that this affected price comparison. No contemporary import of similar goods during the intervening period was shown to support a consistent higher trend in values. In these circumstances, the use of isolated invoices without demonstrating a reasonable basis for adjustment did not justify valuation under the residual rule.
Conclusion: The enhancement of value was not legally sustainable and the appellant succeeded on the valuation issue.
Final Conclusion: The order enhancing assessable value was set aside and the import was to be assessed on the declared value.
Ratio Decidendi: Non-contemporaneous invoices from a different source country cannot sustain residual valuation unless the authority shows a reliable comparable basis and makes necessary adjustments for quantity and other relevant differences.