<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 175 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89202</link>
    <description>Enhanced assessable value of imported auto accessories was not sustained under the residual valuation rule because the department relied on non-contemporaneous invoices from Singapore for Taiwan-origin goods, without showing a reliable comparable basis. The invoices involved lower quantities than the imports, and no contemporaneous imports of similar goods were produced to support a consistent higher price trend. In the absence of necessary adjustments for source, timing, and quantity differences, isolated invoices could not justify rejection of the declared value. The enhancement was set aside and assessment was directed on the declared value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 10:47:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 175 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89202</link>
      <description>Enhanced assessable value of imported auto accessories was not sustained under the residual valuation rule because the department relied on non-contemporaneous invoices from Singapore for Taiwan-origin goods, without showing a reliable comparable basis. The invoices involved lower quantities than the imports, and no contemporaneous imports of similar goods were produced to support a consistent higher price trend. In the absence of necessary adjustments for source, timing, and quantity differences, isolated invoices could not justify rejection of the declared value. The enhancement was set aside and assessment was directed on the declared value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>