Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal's earlier order should be recalled on the ground that an adjournment application said to have been sent by registered post was not taken into account, and whether the matter should be restored for hearing.
Analysis: The Tribunal accepted that the adjournment application had been sent by registered post and that proof of dispatch was produced before the Bench. In these circumstances, the prior order was treated as having been passed without considering the adjournment request, warranting recall of the order and restoration of the matter for hearing.
Conclusion: The recall application was allowed and the Tribunal's earlier order was recalled with a fresh hearing date fixed.