<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 266 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86911</link>
    <description>A tribunal order may be recalled where an adjournment request, shown to have been sent by registered post, was not considered before the earlier order was passed. Proof of dispatch supported the finding that the matter had been decided without taking the pending adjournment application into account. On that basis, the order was recalled and the case restored for fresh hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:16:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 266 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86911</link>
      <description>A tribunal order may be recalled where an adjournment request, shown to have been sent by registered post, was not considered before the earlier order was passed. Proof of dispatch supported the finding that the matter had been decided without taking the pending adjournment application into account. On that basis, the order was recalled and the case restored for fresh hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>