Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether recovery proceedings could be taken for the duty demand when the appeal had already been remanded with a direction to decide the stay application and thereafter the appeal on merits.
Analysis: The appeal had been disposed of by remand, with the Collector (Appeals) directed to first decide the stay application and then decide the appeal itself. In that situation, coercive action for recovery of the duty confirmed by the Assistant Collector could not be pursued pending the outcome before the Collector (Appeals).
Outcome: The Department was directed to await the decision of the Collector (Appeals), and coercive recovery was held to be impermissible at that stage.