<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (12) TMI 153 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84214</link>
    <description>Where an appeal is remanded with a direction to decide the stay application first and then the appeal on merits, coercive recovery of the confirmed duty cannot proceed while the matter remains pending before the appellate authority. The Department must await the Collector (Appeals)&#039; decision, and recovery action at that stage is impermissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:49:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (12) TMI 153 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84214</link>
      <description>Where an appeal is remanded with a direction to decide the stay application first and then the appeal on merits, coercive recovery of the confirmed duty cannot proceed while the matter remains pending before the appellate authority. The Department must await the Collector (Appeals)&#039; decision, and recovery action at that stage is impermissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>