Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence and customs authorities have jurisdiction to investigate and adjudicate alleged breach of EPCG licence conditions, notwithstanding issuance of an export obligation discharge certificate by the licensing authority.
Analysis: The allegations concerned use of unconnected third-party shipping bills and false declarations for obtaining discharge of export obligation, resulting in alleged loss of customs duty. This was distinct from an allegation of misrepresentation in obtaining the licence. A discharge certificate issued by the licensing authority does not bar customs authorities from investigating breach of conditions attached to a duty-exempt import where fraud, concealment, misrepresentation or misdeclaration is alleged. No statutory bar to the customs proceedings was shown. The challenge to a show-cause notice was therefore not fit for interference in writ jurisdiction, while the petitioners could place their defence before the adjudicating authority.
Conclusion: The customs authorities have jurisdiction to continue proceedings from the show-cause-notice stage concerning the alleged violation of EPCG licence conditions; the issue is against the assessee.