Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the civil court had jurisdiction to entertain a suit and injunction application seeking restraint against access to company accounts and files, where parallel proceedings alleging oppression and mismanagement were pending before the National Company Law Tribunal.
Analysis: Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013 bars civil court jurisdiction in respect of matters which the Tribunal is empowered to determine. Sections 241 and 242 confer wide powers on the Tribunal in oppression and mismanagement proceedings, including interim orders, regulation of company affairs, removal of directors, recovery of undue gains, and any other just and equitable relief. Section 424 and Rule 11 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 further support the Tribunal's power to adopt flexible procedure and grant effective relief, while Section 280 indicates the breadth of its jurisdiction. The relief sought in the suit was held to be capable of being granted by the Tribunal and was not outside its competence merely because it was framed as an injunction against illegal access, alteration, or tampering of company records.
Conclusion: The civil court's jurisdiction was barred, and the injunction relief ought to be pursued before the Tribunal; the order of the trial court dismissing the injunction application was restored.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the relief sought in a civil suit is one that can be granted by the National Company Law Tribunal in proceedings for oppression and mismanagement, the civil court's jurisdiction is excluded by Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013.