Premature writ challenge to provisional PMLA attachment fails until adjudication under Section 8 is reached.

A writ petition challenging a provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was held premature because Section 5(1) attachment is only provisional and the challenge matures after the adjudicating authority acts under Section 8. Since that statutory stage had not yet been reached, judicial interference would have interrupted ongoing proceedings before the prescribed adjudication process was complete. The petition was therefore not maintainable at that stage and was dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether a writ petition challenging a provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 is maintainable before the adjudicating authority passes an order under Section 8 of the Act.

Analysis: The attachment under Section 5(1) is only provisional in nature. The challenge to such attachment matures only after the adjudicating authority proceeds under Section 8. Since the impugned action had not reached that stage, the writ petition sought premature interference with ongoing proceedings and could not be used to set aside the provisional attachment at that stage.

Conclusion: The petition was not maintainable at this stage and was dismissed.

---