https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792176 A writ petition challenging a provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was held premature because Section 5(1) attachment is only provisional and the challenge matures after the adjudicating authority acts under Section 8. Since that statutory stage had not yet been reached, judicial interference would have interrupted ongoing proceedings before the prescribed adjudication process was complete. The petition was therefore not maintainable at that stage and was dismissed. en-us Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 May 2026 08:14:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792176 A writ petition challenging a provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was held premature because Section 5(1) attachment is only provisional and the challenge matures after the adjudicating authority acts under Section 8. Since that statutory stage had not yet been reached, judicial interference would have interrupted ongoing proceedings before the prescribed adjudication process was complete. The petition was therefore not maintainable at that stage and was dismissed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792176