Condonation of inordinate delay refused where no justification was shown, and the impugned orders were upheld on merits.

Inordinate delay in filing the appeals was not condoned because no justifiable reason was shown for the delay of 2626 and 2104 days, and the appeals failed on that ground. The Court also examined the material on record and found no basis to interfere with the impugned orders on merits, so the substantive challenge was also rejected. The appeals were therefore dismissed both for delay and on merits.

---

---

Issues: Whether the inordinate delay in filing the appeals deserved condonation and whether any interference with the impugned orders was warranted on merits.

Analysis: The appeals were filed with an inordinate delay of 2626 and 2104 days. No justifiable reason was found to excuse the delay, and the request for condonation was rejected. The material on record was also examined and no basis for interference with the impugned orders was found.

Conclusion: The delay was not condoned and the appeals were dismissed both on the ground of delay and on merits.

---