<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1103 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790034</link>
    <description>Inordinate delay in filing the appeals was not condoned because no justifiable reason was shown for the delay of 2626 and 2104 days, and the appeals failed on that ground. The Court also examined the material on record and found no basis to interfere with the impugned orders on merits, so the substantive challenge was also rejected. The appeals were therefore dismissed both for delay and on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1103 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790034</link>
      <description>Inordinate delay in filing the appeals was not condoned because no justifiable reason was shown for the delay of 2626 and 2104 days, and the appeals failed on that ground. The Court also examined the material on record and found no basis to interfere with the impugned orders on merits, so the substantive challenge was also rejected. The appeals were therefore dismissed both for delay and on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>