Agricultural income cannot be taxed as other sources when credible evidence shows land ownership and genuine cultivation.

Where credible evidence established ownership and use of agricultural land for cultivation and allied rural activities, the resulting receipts could not be taxed as income from other sources on mere suspicion. A village mukhia certificate showing agricultural land ownership, fruit and crop cultivation, and fish farming was accepted as proof of agricultural operations and agricultural income. The addition was therefore unsustainable and was deleted for both assessment years.

---

---

Issues: Whether the addition made by treating the assessee's disclosed agricultural income as income from other sources was sustainable.

Analysis: The assessee produced a certificate from the village mukhia indicating ownership of agricultural land and cultivation of mango, guava, other fruits, vegetables, paddy, wheat, and income from a pond used for fish farming. The certificate was accepted as showing that the assessee had agricultural operations and derived agricultural income.

Conclusion: The addition was held unsustainable and was deleted for both assessment years.

Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded in both appeals and the impugned additions were set aside.

Ratio Decidendi: Where credible evidence establishes ownership and use of agricultural land for cultivation and allied rural activities, the resulting income cannot be assessed as income from other sources merely on suspicion.

---