https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782017 ITAT Ranchi held that the income in dispute was agricultural income, not income from other sources. Relying on a certificate issued by the Village Mukhia, the Tribunal accepted that the assessee owned 6 acres of agricultural land and was actually engaged in agriculture. Consequently, the addition made by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A) for both assessment years was found unsustainable. The Tribunal deleted the entire addition and allowed the assessee's appeals in full. en-us Fri, 10 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:57:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782017 ITAT Ranchi held that the income in dispute was agricultural income, not income from other sources. Relying on a certificate issued by the Village Mukhia, the Tribunal accepted that the assessee owned 6 acres of agricultural land and was actually engaged in agriculture. Consequently, the addition made by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A) for both assessment years was found unsustainable. The Tribunal deleted the entire addition and allowed the assessee's appeals in full. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 10 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782017