Petition dismissed; seizure and penalty for technical e-way bill address error unjustified; Article 136 discretion declined SC dismissed the petition, agreeing with HC that seizure and penalty based solely on a technical error in an auto-populated e-way bill shipping address ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Petition dismissed; seizure and penalty for technical e-way bill address error unjustified; Article 136 discretion declined
SC dismissed the petition, agreeing with HC that seizure and penalty based solely on a technical error in an auto-populated e-way bill shipping address were not justified. The Court held the proceedings against the anonymized party were unwarranted on that ground and declined to exercise discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136, finding the case not fit for interference.
The delay of "84 days in filing the present petition is condoned." I.A. No. 210724/2025 is allowed. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, the Court held that it is "not a fit case to exercise our discretion under Article 136 of the Constitution of India." Consequently, the petition is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.