https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778114 SC dismissed the petition, agreeing with HC that seizure and penalty based solely on a technical error in an auto-populated e-way bill shipping address were not justified. The Court held the proceedings against the anonymized party were unwarranted on that ground and declined to exercise discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136, finding the case not fit for interference. en-us Mon, 08 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:39:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778114 SC dismissed the petition, agreeing with HC that seizure and penalty based solely on a technical error in an auto-populated e-way bill shipping address were not justified. The Court held the proceedings against the anonymized party were unwarranted on that ground and declined to exercise discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136, finding the case not fit for interference. Case-Laws GST Mon, 08 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778114