Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty imposed for non-compliance with notices issued during the assessment proceedings under section 272A(1)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was sustainable in the facts of the case.
Analysis: The penalty arose from failure to comply with the scrutiny notice under section 143(2) and subsequent notices under section 142(1). The material period showed that most of the defaults occurred during the Covid-19 lockdown, and this circumstance was treated as sufficient to warrant a lenient approach in relation to the alleged non-compliance.
Conclusion: The penalty was not sustainable and was deleted in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded and the penalty order was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Where non-compliance with assessment notices substantially occurs during the Covid-19 lockdown period, a lenient view may justify deletion of penalty for default in compliance.