Speedy trial in cheque dishonour cases reinforced, with coercive process allowed to secure the accused's presence.

In a pending cheque dishonour complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act, the High Court emphasised the statutory mandate for speedy trial under Sections 143(2) and 143(3) and the Supreme Court's directions for expeditious disposal of such cases. It stated that proceedings should be concluded without unnecessary technicality and that the trial court must follow the prescribed procedure for prompt adjudication. It also permitted the trial court to use coercive process where necessary to secure the accused's presence. The complaint was directed to be concluded expeditiously, preferably within six months.

---

---

Issues: Whether directions should be issued to ensure expeditious disposal of the pending complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act and to secure the accused's presence during the trial.

Analysis: The complaint had remained pending for several years. The Court relied on the statutory mandate under Sections 143(2) and 143(3) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and on the directions issued by the Supreme Court for expeditious disposal of cheque dishonour cases. It held that proceedings under the Act should be concluded without unnecessary technicality and that the trial court must follow the prescribed procedure for speedy adjudication. The Court also found it appropriate to permit the trial court to use coercive process where necessary to ensure the accused's presence.

Conclusion: The application was allowed to the extent that the trial court was directed to conclude the complaint expeditiously, preferably within six months, and to take coercive measures if required for securing attendance.

---