Supreme Legal Review Rejected: 412-Day Delay Undermines Petition's Credibility and Substantive Arguments SC dismissed review petition challenging previous order due to significant procedural delay of 412 days. Court found no compelling reasons or satisfactory ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
SC dismissed review petition challenging previous order due to significant procedural delay of 412 days. Court found no compelling reasons or satisfactory explanation for the delay. The petition was rejected both on grounds of procedural tardiness and substantive merits, with pending applications also disposed of accordingly.
The Supreme Court, through Hon'ble Justices J. B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, dismissed the review petition challenging the order dated 20-08-2018 which had dismissed the petitioner's appeal. The Court noted an "inordinate delay of 412 days" in filing the review petition without a "satisfactory explanation." Upon examination, the Court found "no ground warranting review" and accordingly dismissed the petition both "on the ground of delay as well as on merits." Pending applications were also disposed of.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
