Writ relief on additional evidence in tribunal proceedings refused where the permission order was not challenged and alternative remedy remained available.

A writ petition seeking directions to the Tribunal to admit additional evidence, permit further evidentiary steps, and restrain an ongoing appellate hearing was not entertained because the order allowing production of some documents had not been challenged. In the absence of a challenge to that order, mandamus to compel admission and consideration of the remaining documents was unwarranted. The Court further noted that any grievance against the Tribunal's final order, including alleged non-consideration of relevant material, could be pursued through the appropriate remedy if and when such order was passed. Interference to halt the Tribunal proceedings was therefore not justified, and the petition was dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether a writ petition could be entertained to direct the Tribunal to admit additional evidence, permit further evidentiary steps, and restrain the ongoing appellate hearing.

Analysis: The petition sought directions to the Tribunal regarding additional evidence and further conduct of the appeal, but the order permitting production of some documents was not challenged. In the absence of a challenge to that order, a mandamus to compel admission and consideration of the remaining documents was not warranted. The Court also noted that any grievance arising from the final order of the Tribunal, including non-consideration of relevant material, could be pursued in the appropriate remedy if and when such order was made. On the basis of the reliefs sought and the allegations pleaded, interference to stop the Tribunal proceedings was not justified.

Conclusion: The writ petition was not entertained and was dismissed.

---