<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1170 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767784</link>
    <description>A writ petition seeking directions to the Tribunal to admit additional evidence, permit further evidentiary steps, and restrain an ongoing appellate hearing was not entertained because the order allowing production of some documents had not been challenged. In the absence of a challenge to that order, mandamus to compel admission and consideration of the remaining documents was unwarranted. The Court further noted that any grievance against the Tribunal&#039;s final order, including alleged non-consideration of relevant material, could be pursued through the appropriate remedy if and when such order was passed. Interference to halt the Tribunal proceedings was therefore not justified, and the petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 08:48:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=808813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1170 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767784</link>
      <description>A writ petition seeking directions to the Tribunal to admit additional evidence, permit further evidentiary steps, and restrain an ongoing appellate hearing was not entertained because the order allowing production of some documents had not been challenged. In the absence of a challenge to that order, mandamus to compel admission and consideration of the remaining documents was unwarranted. The Court further noted that any grievance against the Tribunal&#039;s final order, including alleged non-consideration of relevant material, could be pursued through the appropriate remedy if and when such order was passed. Interference to halt the Tribunal proceedings was therefore not justified, and the petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>