TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Writ Petition Challenging Orders Under Central Excise Act, 1944: Petitioners Directed to Continue Appeals Process Within Four Weeks</h1> <h3>VSP Udyog Private Limited & Anr. Versus Union of India & Ors.</h3> The Calcutta HC addressed a writ petition contesting four orders under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court directed the petitioners to pursue their ... Maintainability of petition - availability of alternative statutory remedy - petitioners did not put in the pre-deposit as is required for maintaining such appeals - HELD THAT:- Considering the fact that the petitioners had already applied before the statutory authority by filing appeals and at this stage since learned advocate representing the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are ready and willing to pursue the aforesaid appeal provided the communications dated 30th September, 2024 are permitted to be withdrawn, I am of the view that in the fitness of things and not to render the petitioners remediless, the petitioners should be permitted to pursue the appeal filed by them. Accordingly, the petitioners are permitted to withdraw the letters dated 30th September, 2024. The Commissioner of Appeals is directed to if necessary by passing appropriate orders to restore the appeal, hear out and dispose of the appeals in accordance with law, subject to compliance of statutory formalities. Application disposed off. The Calcutta High Court addressed a writ petition challenging four orders under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The petitioners had also filed appeals before the Commissioner of Appeals but did not deposit the required amount due to the pending writ petition. The Court directed the petitioners to exhaust their statutory remedy by pursuing the appeals before the Commissioner of Appeals. The petitioners were permitted to withdraw their previous communications seeking withdrawal of the appeals, and the Commissioner of Appeals was directed to hear and dispose of the appeals in accordance with the law. If the petitioners reapply within four weeks, the Commissioner of Appeals will consider their request and proceed accordingly. The writ petition and related applications were disposed of with these directions.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
