https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766468 The Calcutta HC addressed a writ petition contesting four orders under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court directed the petitioners to pursue their statutory remedy by continuing with their appeals before the Commissioner of Appeals. The petitioners were allowed to retract their prior communications seeking withdrawal of these appeals. The Commissioner of Appeals was instructed to hear and resolve the appeals per legal standards. The petitioners must reapply within four weeks for their requests to be considered. The writ petition and associated applications were disposed of following these directions. en-us Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:17:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766468 The Calcutta HC addressed a writ petition contesting four orders under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court directed the petitioners to pursue their statutory remedy by continuing with their appeals before the Commissioner of Appeals. The petitioners were allowed to retract their prior communications seeking withdrawal of these appeals. The Commissioner of Appeals was instructed to hear and resolve the appeals per legal standards. The petitioners must reapply within four weeks for their requests to be considered. The writ petition and associated applications were disposed of following these directions. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766468