<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1015 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766468</link>
    <description>Where the petitioners had already invoked the statutory appellate remedy against the original orders, writ intervention was not considered appropriate at that stage, and they were relegated to the appellate forum. The Court nevertheless allowed withdrawal of the communications seeking withdrawal of the appeals, so that the appeals could be restored if necessary and then heard on merits in accordance with law, subject to statutory compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:17:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=801964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1015 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766468</link>
      <description>Where the petitioners had already invoked the statutory appellate remedy against the original orders, writ intervention was not considered appropriate at that stage, and they were relegated to the appellate forum. The Court nevertheless allowed withdrawal of the communications seeking withdrawal of the appeals, so that the appeals could be restored if necessary and then heard on merits in accordance with law, subject to statutory compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>