Court Allows Appeal Delay Due to Address Error; Orders Reconsideration of Export Drawback Case for Fair Hearing.

The HC condoned a 66-day delay in filing an appeal regarding the recovery of drawback for exported goods, interest, and penalty. The delay was attributed to the impugned order being sent to an old address. The HC set aside the initial order and remanded the case to the Appellate Authority for reconsideration on its merits, ensuring the petitioner is given a fair opportunity. The Writ Petition was disposed of without costs, and associated miscellaneous petitions were closed.

---

---

Issues:
Challenging order dated 02.04.2024 passed by the first respondent regarding recovery of drawback for exported goods, interest, and penalty. Delay in filing appeal before the Appellate Authority due to impugned order sent to old address. Request for condonation of delay and direction for Appellate Authority to consider and pass appropriate orders.

Analysis:
The petitioner filed a Writ Petition challenging the order passed by the first respondent seeking recovery of drawback for exported goods, interest, and penalty. The petitioner argued that show cause notices were issued for the period 2004 to 2014 under Customs rules. The second respondent passed an ex-parte order due to the petitioner's non-appearance at a personal hearing during the Covid-19 pandemic. The appeal filed by the petitioner before the first respondent was rejected as it was beyond the limitation period. The petitioner contended that the delay was due to the impugned order being sent to the old address, rendering them unaware of the same. The petitioner requested the Court to condone the delay and direct the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal.

The Court considered the petitioner's reason for the delay and the principle of substantial justice over technicalities. It was noted that the impugned order was sent to the old address of the petitioner, leading to the delay in filing the appeal. The Court, in line with the principle of substantial justice, decided to condone the delay of 66 days in filing the appeal before the Appellate Authority. Both parties agreed to contest the case before the Appellate Authority. Consequently, the Court remanded the matter to the Appellate Authority for further consideration and appropriate orders.

The Court passed orders to condone the delay in filing the appeal, set aside the order of the first respondent, and directed the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal on its merits and in accordance with the law. The Appellate Authority was instructed to provide a sufficient opportunity to the petitioner and resolve the matter expeditiously. The Writ Petition was disposed of with no costs, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

---