<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 139 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761153</link>
    <description>The HC condoned a 66-day delay in filing an appeal regarding the recovery of drawback for exported goods, interest, and penalty. The delay was attributed to the impugned order being sent to an old address. The HC set aside the initial order and remanded the case to the Appellate Authority for reconsideration on its merits, ensuring the petitioner is given a fair opportunity. The Writ Petition was disposed of without costs, and associated miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:34:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 139 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761153</link>
      <description>The HC condoned a 66-day delay in filing an appeal regarding the recovery of drawback for exported goods, interest, and penalty. The delay was attributed to the impugned order being sent to an old address. The HC set aside the initial order and remanded the case to the Appellate Authority for reconsideration on its merits, ensuring the petitioner is given a fair opportunity. The Writ Petition was disposed of without costs, and associated miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>