TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the High Court's judgment required interference for want of consideration of the appellant's contentions and whether the appeal should be restored for fresh hearing.
Analysis: The impugned judgment was found to have merely reproduced two paragraphs of the CESTAT order and to have accepted its conclusions in a single sentence without dealing with the appellant's contentions. The order therefore disclosed no proper application of mind to the issues raised before the High Court.
Conclusion: The impugned judgment was set aside and the appeal was restored to the file of the Delhi High Court for hearing afresh, with all merits kept open.
TaxTMI 
