<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 7 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761021</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found that the High Court had not properly dealt with the appellant&#039;s contentions, as its judgment largely reproduced the CESTAT order and accepted its conclusions in a single sentence. This reflected no real application of mind to the issues raised before it. The impugned judgment was therefore set aside and the appeal was restored to the Delhi High Court for a fresh hearing, with all merits kept open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 7 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761021</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found that the High Court had not properly dealt with the appellant&#039;s contentions, as its judgment largely reproduced the CESTAT order and accepted its conclusions in a single sentence. This reflected no real application of mind to the issues raised before it. The impugned judgment was therefore set aside and the appeal was restored to the Delhi High Court for a fresh hearing, with all merits kept open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>