Appellants Granted Adjournment Despite Inadequate Grounds

The Tribunal granted a final adjournment to the appellants, allowing them time to prepare for the hearing despite finding the grounds for the adjournment request inadequate. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of the ill member's presence and the ability of the appellants to engage legal representation. The hearing was rescheduled to a later date to facilitate the appellants' arrangements for arguing the matter.

---

---

Issues: Request for adjournment due to the illness of a key member of the industrial firm.

Analysis:
The case involved a request for adjournment of a hearing due to the illness of a key member of an industrial firm. The applicant, represented by Shri V.H. Panse, Chief Accountant and authorised signatory, sought an adjournment as the KARTA of the firm, Shri R.M. Dhariwal, was hospitalized and unable to attend the hearing. The Tribunal noted that the matter had been previously adjourned and considered the grounds for the current request. The Tribunal acknowledged that a party could seek adjournment on genuine grounds but emphasized that the mere illness of a member of an industrial firm, including the Chairman or Karta, may not be sufficient unless their presence is absolutely necessary for the hearing. The Tribunal scrutinized the application and found that it did not establish the necessity of Shri R.M. Dhariwal's presence at the hearing, nor did it indicate that he would personally argue the matter or that the appellants were unable to engage an Advocate. Despite the inadequacy of the grounds provided, considering it was the first day of hearing, the Tribunal granted a final adjournment to allow the appellants to make necessary arrangements for arguing the matter. The hearing was rescheduled to a later date, providing the appellants with a final opportunity to prepare for the proceedings.

---