<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 232 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75166</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a final adjournment to the appellants, allowing them time to prepare for the hearing despite finding the grounds for the adjournment request inadequate. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of the ill member&#039;s presence and the ability of the appellants to engage legal representation. The hearing was rescheduled to a later date to facilitate the appellants&#039; arrangements for arguing the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 232 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75166</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a final adjournment to the appellants, allowing them time to prepare for the hearing despite finding the grounds for the adjournment request inadequate. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of the ill member&#039;s presence and the ability of the appellants to engage legal representation. The hearing was rescheduled to a later date to facilitate the appellants&#039; arrangements for arguing the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>