1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal Timing Critical: Know When to Challenge Tribunal Orders.</h1> The Tribunal held that the communication dated 29/30-5-78 of the Assistant Collector was appealable as it constituted an order providing reasons for the ... Appealable Order Issues:1. Appealability of the communication dated 29/30-5-78 of the Assistant Collector.2. Appealability of the communication dated 19/23-10-78 of the Assistant Collector.3. Determination of whether the appeal was filed within the limitation period.Analysis:1. The appellants contended that the communication dated 29/30-5-78 of the Assistant Collector was not an appealable order as it was merely in the form of a letter and did not provide an opportunity for a hearing. However, the Tribunal found that this communication constituted an order as it examined the representation of the appellants, rejected their contention, and provided reasons for the decision. The Tribunal referred to the criteria set by the Supreme Court for a decision to be judicial, which were satisfied in this case. Therefore, the appellants were entitled to file an appeal against this communication.2. Regarding the communication dated 19/23-10-78 of the Assistant Collector, it was found to be a reiteration of the earlier decision communicated in the letter dated 29/30-5-78. The Assistant Collector advised the appellants to file an appeal if they were aggrieved by the decision dated 29/30-5-78. The Tribunal determined that the later communication did not constitute a separate appealable order, as it was based on the earlier decision. Therefore, the appellants could not argue that the later communication was the appealable order.3. The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Collector's decision that the appeal was barred by time. The Appellate Collector had rejected the appeal as it was filed long after the expiry of the limitation period calculated from the date of receipt of the order dated 29/30-5-78. Since the appeal was not filed within the limitation period, it was deemed to be barred by time, and the Tribunal dismissed the appeal based on this ground.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
