https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72799 The Tribunal held that the communication dated 29/30-5-78 of the Assistant Collector was appealable as it constituted an order providing reasons for the decision. However, the communication dated 19/23-10-78 was not deemed a separate appealable order but a reiteration of the earlier decision. The appeal was found to be time-barred as it was filed after the limitation period from the date of the initial order, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Fri, 23 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 May 2011 11:47:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72799 The Tribunal held that the communication dated 29/30-5-78 of the Assistant Collector was appealable as it constituted an order providing reasons for the decision. However, the communication dated 19/23-10-78 was not deemed a separate appealable order but a reiteration of the earlier decision. The appeal was found to be time-barred as it was filed after the limitation period from the date of the initial order, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 23 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72799