Appellate Tribunal rules application premature, allows penalty deposit without stay.

The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Bombay held in 1986 (6) TMI 168 that the application was premature due to the duty amount not being quantified. However, it allowed the deposit of the penalty amount without a stay. Shri V.J. Taraporewala appeared for the Appellant, and Shri N K. Pattekar represented the Respondent Collector.

---

---

The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Bombay in 1986 (6) TMI 168 stated that the application was premature as the duty amount was not quantified, but the penalty amount could be deposited without a stay. Shri V.J. Taraporewala represented the Appellant, and Shri N K. Pattekar represented the Respondent Collector.

---