https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72533 The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Bombay held in 1986 (6) TMI 168 that the application was premature due to the duty amount not being quantified. However, it allowed the deposit of the penalty amount without a stay. Shri V.J. Taraporewala appeared for the Appellant, and Shri N K. Pattekar represented the Respondent Collector. en-us Wed, 25 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 May 2011 12:33:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72533 The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Bombay held in 1986 (6) TMI 168 that the application was premature due to the duty amount not being quantified. However, it allowed the deposit of the penalty amount without a stay. Shri V.J. Taraporewala appeared for the Appellant, and Shri N K. Pattekar represented the Respondent Collector. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 25 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72533