Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was justified when the cash payments were made in a running account to a sister concern, the parties were identified, the transactions were found genuine, and the requirement of cash payment was supported by the material on record.
Analysis: The payments were accepted as genuine and identifiable, and the assessee's case fell within the parameters indicated by the CBDT circular and the exception contemplated by rule 6DD(j). The circular was treated as intended to prevent a rigid and harsh application of section 40A(3) where the circumstances justified cash payment, and the explanation that cash payment was required was accepted on the facts.
Conclusion: The deletion of the addition under section 40A(3) was upheld and the Revenue's appeals were rejected.